Peer Review Process<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n All manuscripts submitted to the Jordanian Journal of Engineering and Chemical Industries <\/em>(JJECI) <\/em>are subject to a double-blind peer-review process to ensure the quality of their underlying research methodology and argument. The Jordanian Journal of Engineering and Chemical Industries <\/em>(JJECI) <\/em>is committed to the highest standards of peer review. After submitting the manuscript by the author (s) in the journal management system, the manuscript will be primarily studied based on publishing experts (maximum a week). Please study carefully the guideline for authors<\/strong><\/a> to expedite set up the manuscript as precise as codification guidelines in the system and then submit it. If it is accepted in the first stage, the manuscript will be assessed by the editor-in-chief.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Upon receipt of the manuscript, the corresponding author is\nnotified and will receive the number under which the manuscript has been\nregistered, as well as the name and e-mail address of the scientific editor who\nwill handle it. From this point onwards, authors should communicate with the\neditor-in-chief only about the progress of the reviewing process. The\nmanuscript will be sent to at least two referees and a reply may be expected at\nthe earliest four weeks after submission. Manuscripts can be accepted, with\nminor or major revision, or rejected. If the decision is \u2018revision\u2019, the\nauthors are requested to take the remarks of the referees and editors into\naccount. A second reviewing process can follow. Upon final acceptance, the\nauthors provide a final version of the manuscript inappropriate file formats\n(not a PDF) (text as WORD doc. and tables as Excel file) and send these to the\neditor-in-chief. The authors will then be notified when the paper will be\npublished. Only one galley proof will be sent as a PDF file to the\ncorresponding author. This proof must be carefully corrected and sent back\nwithin 2 working days.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A weekly email will be\nsubmitted to the reviewers and the manuscript will be given back due to lack of\nmanuscript review after one month, then it will be sent to another reviewer. Based\non the level of the requested modifications, the viewpoints of reviewers, the\naccuracy and speed of the modifications done by authors, being accepted in this\npublication takes about one year (in case of final approval by\nreviewers). Secretary specialist and scientific committee based on\nrelevant content and subject. This stage will usually take two\nmonths. After third phase acceptance, the manuscript will be sent to two\nreviewers, and then the review process of the manuscript is as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n – If two\nreviewers reject a manuscript, it will be disapproved;<\/p>\n\n\n\n – If the opinion of\nthe two reviews is the total revision of the manuscript, the manuscript will be\nsubmitted to the author for revision;<\/p>\n\n\n\n – If a\nreviewer’s opinion is a general revision and the second one rejects the manuscript,\nthe essay will be submitted to the third reviewer and according to\nhis idea relevant to the first and second item, the decision will be made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n – When the author modified\nthe manuscript and submitted it, the manuscript would be given to another\nreviewer for comparative assessment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Peer Review Process All manuscripts submitted to the Jordanian Journal of Engineering and Chemical Industries (JJECI) are subject to a double-blind peer-review process to ensure the quality of their underlying research methodology and argument. The Jordanian Journal of Engineering and Chemical Industries (JJECI) is committed to the highest standards of peer review. After submitting the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2910","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/8039c1d0385554959.temporary.link\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2910"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/8039c1d0385554959.temporary.link\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/8039c1d0385554959.temporary.link\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/8039c1d0385554959.temporary.link\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/8039c1d0385554959.temporary.link\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2910"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/8039c1d0385554959.temporary.link\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2910\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3275,"href":"https:\/\/8039c1d0385554959.temporary.link\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2910\/revisions\/3275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/8039c1d0385554959.temporary.link\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"